2 responses to “Upper West: NPP Youth Scold Former Interior Minister for Reclaiming Donated Campaign Pickup”

1. 

   Enock Yirbie

   June 28, 2025

   Let’s get the facts straight: Hon. Ambrose Dery did not “reclaimed” the campaign pickup out of greed or malice, but out of a necessary demand for accountability and proper management of party resources. The pickup vehicle was donated to the party, not to individual interests. The fact that a vehicle, meant for regional party use, was hijacked, misused, and repurposed for personal interests should be a matter of concern, not condemnation. It’s not a ‘reclaiming’; it’s a correction of misuse and a restoration of proper order.

   This isn’t just intellectual dishonesty, it’s a calculated attempt to weaponize public sentiment against a man who has served with distinction. When a leader is pushed into making a tough decision in the face of blatant provocation, it is dishonest and morally weak to judge only the reaction while pretending the provocation never existed. True justice examines the full story, not just the part that fits a grievance or feeds division.

   So before the chorus of critics grows louder, let them first ask themselves: What role did internal sabotage, entitlement, or factional disrespect play in all this? Until that is confronted, every accusation remains half-baked, every insult hollow, and every headline a betrayal of the truth.

   As media professionals, your duty is to report truth, not sensationalize half-truths that serve no purpose but to create division. The party deserves better than to be dragged into petty internal squabbles for personal gain. If you genuinely care about the NPP’s future, focus on the issues that matter: unity, progress, and leadership that puts the party above self-interest. This is not a moment for distortion, but for reflection on how the party’s resources are being managed.

   LikeLike

   Reply
2. 

   Enock Yirbie

   June 28, 2025

   If I may ask? Why is the focus centered only on the retrieval of one pickup, while completely ignoring the circumstances that led to that decision?

   This selective outrage is not only misleading but intellectually dishonest. The Upper West Region was given two pickups, so the real question is: why is only one being requested back?

   If this were about selfishness or reclaiming what had been given, wouldn’t both have been taken? Clearly, the action was not impulsive, but a response to something deeper, yet that context is being deliberately ignored.

   It is the height of hypocrisy to criticize a reaction without acknowledging the provocation that birthed it. If we are going to hold leaders accountable, let us do so with fairness and honesty, not with half-truths fueled by bias or hidden agendas. Judgment without context is not justice, it is slander dressed as concern.

   Before we point fingers, let us ask: What really happened, and why? Until then, the criticism remains shallow, and the narrative dangerously one-sided.

   LikeLike

   Reply